Selected Candidate Site
#1 Candidate Site A
Priority for further investigation
Noxheim DerivedEvaluated
- Evidence
- 5 of 8 evidence categories evaluated
- Network area
- Ei covering
Development Intelligence
Find the sites worth investigating.
Screen large areas against official evidence, compare Candidate Sites, understand constraints, and move the strongest opportunities into development.
Built for BESS, solar, wind and hybrid renewable development teams.
NOXHEIM
www.noxheim.com/opportunities
Search Area → Candidate Sites
3 Candidate Sites
5 of 8 evidence categories evaluated
Sample screening
Search Area
Opportunity Zone
Candidate Site
Sample
Sample Search Area with three Candidate Sites. Selected Candidate Site A, Priority for further investigation. 5 of 8 evidence categories evaluated. Ranking is Noxheim derived, not an official verdict.
The problem
Weak opportunities survive too long when evidence is hard to compare.
Screening notes live in GIS exports, emails and slides. Missing evidence can look like a pass. Grid context sits apart from the site itself. The reason a location was kept — or should have been stopped — is easy to lose between first look and project development.
Noxheim keeps geographic screening, Evidence Coverage and the development record in one workspace, so teams spend diligence on sites that still deserve it.
- Find areas worth investigating earlier
- Stop weak sites when evidence is missing
- Compare Candidate Sites on one standard
- Keep the decision attached into the Project
Find
Search a geography. Identify Candidate Sites worth investigating.
Candidate Sites are grown from qualifying land inside the Search Area. Opportunity Zones stay in the background as broader remaining geography.
- 01
Search Area
A bounded geography you choose to investigate.
- 02
Opportunity Zones
Broader qualifying geography after supported exclusions — context for Candidate Sites.
- 03
Candidate Sites
Bounded investigation targets grown from qualifying land. Rankings, constraints and next investigations show what to look at — not whether a site can be built.
NOXHEIM
www.noxheim.com/opportunities
Sample screening. Opportunity Zones recede as context. Candidate Sites are the investigation layer.
Understand
Noxheim does not hide missing evidence.
Every Candidate Site shows what was evaluated and what was not. Official Source, Customer Entered and Noxheim Derived stay labelled. Missing evidence is not treated as a pass.
Candidate Site A in this sample has 5 of 8 evidence categories evaluated. Road proximity and detailed terrain remain not evaluated.
NOXHEIM
www.noxheim.com/opportunities
Evidence Coverage · Candidate Site A
SampleEvidence Coverage
5 of 8 evidence categories evaluated
Environmental protection
0.0% overlap of site envelope
Official SourceEvaluatedNatura 2000
0.0% overlap of site envelope
Official SourceEvaluatedLand cover
NMD 2023
Official SourceEvaluatedTerrain
Copernicus GLO-90 · Coarse terrain evidence
Official SourceEvaluatedDetailed terrain
Not evaluated
Not evaluatedNetwork geography
Ei official covering
Official SourceEvaluatedRoad proximity
Not evaluated
Not evaluatedResidential proximity
Not evaluated
Not evaluated
Screening ≠ engineering feasibility
A Candidate Site is an investigation target. It is not a load-flow study or a constructability verdict.
Ranking ≠ official verdict
Investigation priority is Noxheim derived from evaluated evidence. Authorities do not rank these sites.
Network covering ≠ available capacity
Official Ei geography shows which network area covers a location. It does not show available MW or a connection offer.
Compare / decide
Compare Candidate Sites on the same evidence. Then decide what to keep.
See differences in Evidence Coverage, covering geography and remaining uncertainty. Save a Candidate Site as an Opportunity. Shortlist, reject, reopen or promote happen on that Opportunity — not on the screening result.
Compare selected Candidate Sites
Sample| Field | Candidate Site A | Candidate Site B | Candidate Site C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recommendation | Priority for further investigation | Worth investigating | Secondary screening priority |
| Contiguous ha | 9.4 | 11.2 | 14.8 |
| Network covering | Official covering, not capacity | Official covering, not capacity | Official covering, not capacity |
| Evidence coverage | 5 of 8 evidence categories evaluated | 5 of 8 evidence categories evaluated | 4 of 8 evidence categories evaluated |
| Main uncertainty | Road proximity is not evaluated | Detailed terrain is not evaluated | Road proximity and detailed terrain not evaluated |
Investigation priority from stored evidence. Not a success score.
Candidate Site
On the screening result.
- Compare
- Save as opportunity
Opportunity
After you keep a site.
- Shortlist
- Reject
- Reopen
- Promote to project
Develop
The same site, from Candidate Site to Project.
Evidence and origin stay attached when a Candidate Site becomes an Opportunity and then a Project.
01
Candidate Site
A bounded investigation target from geographic screening, with Evidence Coverage attached.
02
Opportunity
A Candidate Site your team chose to keep. Shortlist, reject, reopen, or promote to a Project without losing the screening record.
03
Project
Promote when the site is worth developing. Origin, Evidence Coverage and covering geography follow into the project record.
Map
One spatial workspace from screening to development.
Search Areas, Candidate Sites, Opportunities, Projects and official Ei covering geography sit together on the Map.
Covering geography is not available capacity. Protection and land-cover evidence sit on Evidence Coverage for each Candidate Site — not as extra map layers. Layer availability depends on the geography you search.
- Search Areas
- Candidate Sites
- Opportunities
- Projects
- Local network · covering
- NUP · planning context
NOXHEIM
www.noxheim.com/map
Sample Map. Official Ei covering is geographic context. Candidate Sites, Opportunities and Projects share the same workspace.
NOXHEIM
www.noxheim.com/connections
Stockholm North BESS
Connection case on a Project · sample workspace
Grid StudyOn Track
Prospect
Screened
Enquiry
Application
Grid Study
Offer
Agreement
Construction
Energisation
Connection case
- Stage
- Grid Study
- Reference
- ELV-2026-0418
- Status
- On Track
Application readiness
50%
4 / 8 required actions complete
Workflow readiness.
Connect
Track the connection process after the site becomes a Project.
Keep stages, requirements, deadlines, documents and next actions on the same Project record. Connection process tracking starts after an Opportunity is promoted.
Workflow readiness measures recorded requirements on the connection case.
Monitor
Official sources change. Portfolio Attention brings them back to the team.
Noxheim stores official source snapshots, identifies published changes with a geographic match, and lists them on matched projects for review. Overview shows which active projects need action and the next recorded workflow step.
During the design-partner phase, official sources are refreshed by Noxheim operations. A delayed source update is not the same as “no changes”.
NOXHEIM
www.noxheim.com/changes
Sample change review
SampleSource snapshot
Official network development plan
Retrieved 12 Aug 2026 · Ei
Change
Published source update
Geographic match for team review
Matched project
2 portfolio projects
Sample workspace
Official Source match for team review.
Use cases
Built for BESS and renewable development teams.
For Swedish BESS, solar, wind and hybrid development teams — and consultants working those same projects.
Geographic opportunity discovery
Find Candidate Sites in a Search Area
Select a geography, derive Opportunity Zones from qualifying land, and identify Candidate Sites worth investigating — before a project record exists.
- Search Area
- Opportunity Zones
- Candidate Sites
Provenance
Know where Candidate Site evidence comes from.
Noxheim separates Official Source information, Customer Entered data and Noxheim Derived context — on the site, not only after a project exists.
Official Source
Published information from authorities and network-related sources — including Ei covering geography, NMD 2023, Natura 2000 and protected areas.
Customer Entered
Search intent, project data, outlook and workflow status entered by your organisation.
Noxheim Derived
Geographic matching, Candidate Site generation, ranking and workflow calculations created from the underlying data. Ranking is not an official verdict.
Source provenance is shown on Evidence Coverage for each Candidate Site.
Trust
Decision support, not a grid connection guarantee.
Noxheim helps teams find sites worth investigating, see missing evidence, and keep that context through connection process tracking and official-source review.
- Screening ≠ engineering feasibility
- Ranking ≠ official verdict
- Network covering ≠ available capacity
Design partner
Help shape Development Intelligence against real Swedish sites.
We are working with a small number of Swedish BESS and renewable development teams to validate Noxheim on real geographies, real evidence gaps and real connection workflows.
Design partners get guided onboarding, close support, screening on real development geographies, and a say in which evidence layers Noxheim develops next.
Book a demo
See Noxheim on a real development workflow.
Tell us about the geographies you develop. We'll walk Search Area to Candidate Sites, Evidence Coverage, Opportunity to Project, and the connection process tracking that follows — in the same workspace you would use.
Find sites worth investigating. Stop weak ones earlier. Keep the evidence behind every decision.
Development Intelligence for Swedish BESS and renewable teams — from Search Area through Candidate Site, Opportunity, Project, connection process tracking and official-source monitoring.